↓
 

SOB: Son of a Bos'n

There are three states of being... Alive, Dead or at Sea.

SOB: Son of a Bos'n
  • About
  • The Boatswain
  • eQuoria
  • Salute the Flag
Home→Published 2004 → May

Monthly Archives: May 2004

Marriage: The separation of the Sacred and the Profane

SOB: Son of a Bos'n Posted on May 11, 2004 by BobJuly 14, 2016  

You’ve all seen crying and hand-wringing by those who believe that Same Sex Marriages [samesexmarriage.ca] somehow violate the sanctity of marriage. (See: Bush vows to defend ‘sanctity of marriage’ [washtimes.com].)

My position is simple. By mixing the secular or profane recognition of legal and financial contracts, known as marriages, with the theological or sacred unions of a man and a woman, also known as marriages, the churches have opened themselves up to this problem.

The major theme behind the drive for same sex marriage contracts is access to the same financial rights and benefits that are given to those who get “married”. Hospital visitation rights, health insurance, the right to raise children and inheritance rights. These are all secular issues. They have nothing to do with the teachings of mainstream religions. [One exception noted below.]

The pastors and priests of this country have allowed the state to license them to certify those types of marriages. In doing so, they have mingled the sacred and the profane. Other countries require two wedding ceremonies. One, by a civil servant, establishing the civil and financial contracts that make up a civil union. The other, by a minister or priest, establishing the spiritual union as taught by that specific church. By co-mingling the sacred and the profane aspects of the marriage union, the religious leaders have lost their ability to control the definition of a “marriage”.

The solution is simple. Each church needs to clearly define what constitutes a marriage based on their theology and perform the appropriate ceremonies needed to recognize that union. However, they must also understand that they cannot and must not control the secular contracts that state recognizes as a marriage union. If they were smart, they would join the bandwagon to recognize same sex and other civil contracts as just that, civil contracts and unions, and work to separate them from the concept of a sacred marriage union.

Sacred [reference.com]: 2. Worthy of religious veneration: the sacred teachings of the Buddha.

Profane [reference.com]: 2. Nonreligious in subject matter, form, or use; secular: sacred and profane music.

The one exception I mentioned is the underlying teachings by some faiths that homosexuality is a sin. (See: HOMOSEXUALITY—SIN, OR A CULTURAL BAD HABIT? [apologeticspress.org] for one example.) This, however, has nothing to do with the US Government or a State recognizing a financial contract between two people who are living together. Finally, given the US concept of the separation of church and state, the government cannot base its legal decisions on the teachings of any one church, no matter how mainstream that church is.

Posted in Alive, Commentary, Family, Politics, Spirituality | Tagged Commentary, Family, Spirituality | Leave a reply

Recent Posts

  • SmaRT service to MCC
  • Sociopathic Investors Need Their Pints of Blood
  • AB-2895 Mobilehome Park Rent Increases – OPPOSE
  • Pro-Life should not be just Anti-Abortion
  • Google Privacy Checkup

Community

  • Ashworth-Remillard House
  • Five Wounds Urban Village
  • Silicon Valley VTA Sprinter

eQuoria

  • eQuoria
  • The Boatswain

Categories

  • age-friendly
  • Alive
  • At Sea
  • Commentary
  • Dead
  • Family
  • Life as a Brat
  • MH Living
  • Politics
  • Spirituality
  • Technology
  • The Poetic Side
  • US Navy

Login

  • Register
  • Log in

Archives

  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • August 2017
  • April 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2013
  • September 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • January 2010
  • February 2008
  • March 2007
  • September 2006
  • July 2006
  • May 2004
  • November 2003
© 2017 eQuoria
↑